Monday, February 23, 2009

Maddeningly Tedious E-mail Correspondence

Start at the bottom at BEGINNING and read upwards to END. I am yours truly. Secretary is the person attempting to set an appointment for the interview for CPE residency.

Would someone please take a look at the response from yours truly and tell me how this could be misunderstood?
Let's begin with the week of March 9 - 13. I will hold this week open to your convenience of scheduling. If nothing works for that week, I can keep going through the next week, also, March 16-20. I am eager to complete the step of interviewing. Scheduling this interview will be my #1 priority, and I will work around it.
I'm not sure, but I think I'm being punished. This interview will not be for another MONTH!

END
March 20, 2:00 p.m.
Thank you,
yours truly

On Feb 23, 2009, at 2:31 PM, Secretary wrote:

No there is nothing earlier.

Secretary

-----Original Message-----
From: yours truly
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 2:31 PM
To: Secretary
Subject: Re: 's schedule change!

Nothing earlier?
On Feb 23, 2009, at 2:26 PM, Secretary wrote:

Ok so does this mean you will be available for March 20th at 2:00?

Secretary

-----Original Message-----
From: yours truly
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 2:25 PM
To: Secretary

March 9-13
March 16-23

On Feb 23, 2009, at 2:20 PM, Secretary wrote:

I guess I am not understanding what days you are available.

Secretary

-----Original Message-----
From: yours truly
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 2:13 PM
To: Secretary
Subject: Re: 's schedule change!

Secretary, March 2 will not work. As I said below:
March 9 - 13. I will hold this week open to your convenience of scheduling. If nothing works for that week, I can keep going through the next week, also, March 16-20.
Perhaps you meant March 20?

yours truly

On Feb 23, 2009, at 1:14 PM, Secretary wrote:

Ok. I have it set for March 2nd at 2:30 p.m.

Secretary

-----Original Message-----
From: yours truly
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 12:04 PM
To: Secretary
Subject: Re: 's schedule change!

Secretary:

Let's begin with the week of March 9 - 13. I will hold this week open to your convenience of scheduling. If nothing works for that week, I can keep going through the next week, also, March 16-20. I am eager to complete the step of interviewing. Scheduling this interview will be my #1 priority, and I will work around it.

Thank you,
yours truly

On Feb 23, 2009, at 11:42 AM, Secretary wrote:

Due to some events that are taking place this week I will have to schedule you sometime in March. Could you give me some dates and times in March?

Thank you,
Secretary
BEGINNING

Saturday, February 21, 2009

Self-Disclosure Games

I've decided not to go to Chicago today. Icy weather here is going to give way to snow, and there must be more even more north of here.

I'm reading Winter Hours: Prose, Prose Poems, and Poems, by Mary Oliver, Mariner: 1999. I love this poet. I also enjoy essays by writers about their craft. Mary Oliver is not much for self-disclosure in the direct way that we ask for it in therapy and pastoral care.

My colleague in CPE told me about her interview. Two men and a woman on the interview panel worked her over in that way of guerilla gonzo pseudo-psychoanalytic probing into the wounds of one's life. I have this interview to look forward to, also. So, this morning, I am thinking about self-disclosure.

I wonder sometimes if I had had a "normal" widowing*, if I would not have had such a long grief, with spells of -- torrents of -- self-disclosing pain, injury, wounding, anger, rage, self-pity? -- even as recently as this month. I'll never know. Maybe I can be an illustration for "complicated grief."

This interview will come. How shall I prepare? Everyone says, "Just be yourself." Indeed. I'm thinking it feels like a game. I've lived too long and trained a lot in the psychological strategies used in the service of ministry. One time, I refused to play by the rules of the game, withdrew from the game, and found a better pub in which to toss the darts, better friends to play with, but it did cost me some time and got me a reputation as one who now has "unfinished business" in the old place. Maybe.

Mary Oliver said, on xii in the preface to Winter Hours:
I have felt all my life that I was wise, and tasteful too, to speak very little about myself -- to deflect the curiosity in the personal self that descends upon writers, especially in this country and at this time, from both casual and avid readers. ... I am only too aware of the ways in which inclination and supposition will fill whatever spaces in this world, or a life, are left vacant.


Yes, Ma'am -- the universe abhors a vacuum, and transference is real. People will fill those gaps, as they will.

She goes on to say that, in this book, she is going to do a bit, tiny bit, more disclosure because she realizes she is getting older and some will claim to know her, so she wishes to [my paraphrase here] have some control over filling in some of the gaps, excepting the "important and proper secrets of a heart."

Wise and tasteful. I have been neither, often. Not that millions will read my writing. But, perhaps more importantly, people who know me well, or think they do, often read these thoughts. I am chastened by this thought, sometimes. Still, this sense of others reading over my shoulder has not stopped me from saying some things that might offend. I've never been one to say, "Oh, *&^% 'em," as Reb regularly responded to my reports of hurtful things, mindless things coming from ones I thought better of. I've not been one to take a "live and let live" attitude about some matters, believing that I could be persuasive and change someone's mind. Arrogant?

I have strolled into strange pubs and joined games in progress, hurling my points toward any board that I faced. Maybe I can be more selective now.

As I approach this interview, I realize I feel curious and interested about what kinds of questions may come, what darts will find a way to my center; will I cry when they do? Will I let anger show? Will I go in with a good humor, tell it slant? Develop an angle of delivery that will answer with a clever twist?

Look -- I just want to get on with this next phase of the learning, hazing and all. Earning a Ph.D. should be good practice, already. Somebody hand me a Guinness, I need to play my way through. It's only a game.

*a "normal" widowing: nothing the freedom to marry would not fix

Thursday, February 19, 2009

Friending and other Facebook Phenomena


I was a reluctant newcomer to FACEBOOK back in the day, August 8, 2008. 8/8/08 -- that was not intentional, but what the bleep? One day, I realized I had over 100 friends. Somehow, that was shocking. It's been a long time since I've been "Annie Social" (in seminary). I think I've become more of an introvert over time.

One day, I looked at that list of friends and realized I was not really friends with that many people. We go to church together, we went to school together, we met at a party, or someone thought we would have a lot in common.

One day, I realized I was using FB to process too much of my inner life to have that many acquaintances looking on. I also realized I could not really say I wanted to be friends with some people who perhaps were students at some distant past time, or maybe we had known each other in college, before I knew I was a Lesbian, and this would be juicy gossip to pass around the old circle of friends. Maybe we knew each other from times past that I had left not just geographically, but also spiritually, emotionally, and the like. Some ground is just too full of roots and stones to keep breaking your plow over again.

So, I unfriended a lot of people one day. I figured maybe if someone I unfriended really wanted to be considered friends, they would miss me and get in touch. And, happy to say, one person did that.

I've had some contact from long ago acquaintances who wanted to "friend" me. I feel ambivalent about it, so I just don't respond. There's something kind of rude about blocking someone outright. Maybe if I let the invitation linger, there might be some additional correspondence later on with some additional self-disclosure, explaining more about why being friends with me would be a good or helpful or just pleasantly friendly thing to do.

Sometimes I think I learned to be too guarded in the past. For so many years, as I was coming into awareness of who I was in terms of loving a woman, and deciding how political I wanted to be about that (very much, as it turns out), I wanted control over access to my private world. Turns out, others made their incursions. I've written much earlier here about how that worked, with being outed, with people passing along rumors and lies along with some of the truth, with people of faith turning out to be extremely cruel and stupid. Yea, verily, don't cast your pearls before swine.

A time came when I relinquished that control. But, in the Facebook world, with people showing up again after eras of life have come and gone -- and with the present being so full of what it simply IS every day -- matters that once were private, like coming out, are now passé to me yet shocking to others. Now, I find that same old pearl-casting is falling into the wrong trough.

Maybe I'm too self-conscious to be comfortable on Facebook. Or, rather, maybe it's that I want too much to have my life integrated and consolidated through all of these eras and changes. I want so much for it to have a story line, a narrative, a point.

Maybe everyone goes through radical changes and interruptions in their previously settled senses of what is normal. Surely, I'm not the only one who has allowed the messy, the unexpected, the shock of death, the coming home to self that is being gay, the snags and hooks of certainty that are embedded in a certain way of having faith, and the senses of essential self and essential desires to find meaning and purpose in ways that continue to bring unexpected and unconventional quasi-, parti-, non-, semi-resolution over time. And, I really hope that essential self and those essential desires will hit home with some, to have that feeling of settling down in easy chairs by the fire to catch up and be with each other, authentically.

Apparently, many people want the same. And, I really love the here-and-now information sharing that simply moves us all, even the trivial "I'm up now and blowing my nose" posts that say we're all just getting on with our days. Somehow, that number of friends keeps creeping up over 100. Not sure today, maybe around 125? I'm just going to let it be what it is.

See, I loved and love many of these old friends who keep showing up in my inbox, my request box. I wish to say, come on in, see what has been happening all these years. See what there is to see. Stay, if you like. Move on with me. See what Love has brought to me over the years. See what Living has taken, too. Be sad with me. Rage against the injustice with me. Celebrate the whole with me. I'll try to be as forgiving as I want you to be with me. There is no time to linger, it all changes so fast.